One Rep Max Calculator

Enter the weight you lifted and how many reps you did to estimate your one rep max (1RM) with the Epley, Brzycki and Lombardi formulas, plus training weights for 1–12 reps.

Units
kg
reps

Use a set you did with good form close to failure. Estimates are most accurate between 1 and 10 reps.

Estimated 1RM (average of 3 formulas)
— kg
—Epley
—Brzycki
—Lombardi

Training weights by rep count

Reps% of 1RMWeight

Based on the NSCA percentage-of-1RM chart. Pick the row for your target reps and start a little lighter at first.

Training zones

Goal% of 1RMWeight

Estimates only, not medical advice. If you test a true max, warm up thoroughly and always use a spotter or safety bars. Stop if you feel pain.

About the One Rep Max Calculator

Your one rep max (1RM) is the heaviest weight you can lift for a single repetition with good form. Testing it directly is tiring and risky, so most lifters estimate it from a heavier set of a few reps.

This calculator shows the Epley, Brzycki and Lombardi estimates side by side and uses their average as the headline number. It then builds a percentage chart for 1–12 reps from the NSCA table, rounded to the nearest 5 lb (or 2.5 kg) so you can load the bar right away.

How to use

  1. Optionally pick the lift and choose pounds or kilograms (switching converts the weight you entered).
  2. Enter the weight and the number of clean reps you managed close to failure, e.g. 225 lb × 5.
  3. Read your estimated 1RM (the average) and compare the three formulas below it.
  4. Use the percentage chart and the training-zone table to choose weights for your next sessions.

One rep max formulas

FormulaEquation225 lb × 5
Epley (1985)w × (1 + r ÷ 30)262.5 lb
Brzycki (1993)w × 36 ÷ (37 − r)253.1 lb
Lombardi (1989)w × r0.10264.3 lb
Averagemean of the three260.0 lb

w is the weight lifted and r the number of reps. If you did a single rep, that weight is your 1RM, so all three formulas return it unchanged (Epley is special-cased at r = 1).

Which formula should you trust?

Between 2 and 6 reps the three formulas agree within a few percent. As reps go up they drift apart: Brzycki becomes the most conservative, while Epley and Lombardi read higher. No single formula is right for everyone, which is why the headline here is the average.

  • Sets of 3–6 reps give the most reliable estimates.
  • Above 10 reps, muscular endurance dominates and errors grow quickly.
  • Stick with the same method over time — the trend matters more than the exact number.

How to use the % chart and training zones

Reps12345681012
% 1RM1009593908785807567

Percentages follow the NSCA chart. Typical zones: strength 85–100% for 1–5 reps, hypertrophy 67–85% for 6–12 reps, muscular endurance below 67% for 12+ reps. The chart shows the most you could do for that many reps, so for regular work sets leave one or two reps in the tank.

FAQ

Is a calculated 1RM accurate?

From a set of 3–6 reps it is usually within a few percent of a tested max. Accuracy drops above 10 reps and varies with experience, the lift and how close to failure you went.

Which number should I use – Epley, Brzycki or the average?

Use the average for programming. If you want to be conservative (for example when coming back from a break), use the Brzycki value, which is usually the lowest.

Can I use a set of 15 reps?

The calculator accepts up to 20 reps, but above 10–12 reps the estimate becomes unreliable. For a better number, add weight and retest with 3–8 reps.

Why are the chart weights rounded to 5 lb?

So you can load them with standard plates (2.5 lb on each side). Untick the rounding box to see exact values, or switch to kilograms to round to 2.5 kg.

Should I test my true max?

Only if you are experienced and have a spotter or safety bars. For most lifters an estimated max is enough to plan training and is far less risky.